Sunday, May 8, 2016

Samuel's Mother: Hannah

1 Samuel 1:1-24a

Samuel's Mother: Hannah

Prepared by Dr. John E. Marshall

 

         Samuel was called by YHWH to lead Israel out of an era of apostasy. He was YHWH's main instrument in transitioning the nation from being ruled by Judges to being ruled by a King. His mother was a huge factor in his success.

 

1 Samuel 1:1-3 (Holman) There was a man from Ramathaim-zophim in the hill country of Ephraim. His name was Elkanah son of Jeroham, son of Elihu, son of Tohu, son of Zuph, an Ephraimite. He had two wives, the first named Hannah and the second Peninnah. Peninnah had children, but Hannah was childless. This man would go up from his town every year to worship and to sacrifice to the Lord of Hosts at Shiloh, where Eli's two sons, Hophni and Phinehas, were the Lord's priests.

 

The family's hometown, known as Ramah, was situated about five miles north of Jerusalem and became the center of Samuel's ministry. Ramah is probably identical with the New Testament's Arimathea.

Elkanah had two wives. Peninnah had children; Hannah did not. Elkanah regularly worshiped at Shiloh, located about 20 miles north of Jerusalem. Here, in the center of the Promised Land, the tabernacle was situated.

 

1 Samuel 1:4-7 Whenever Elkanah offered a sacrifice, he always gave portions of the meat to his wife Peninnah and to each of her sons and daughters. But he gave a double portion to Hannah, for he loved her even though the Lord had kept her from conceiving. Her rival would taunt her severely just to provoke her, because the Lord had kept Hannah from conceiving. Whenever she went up to the Lord's house, her rival taunted her in this way every year. Hannah wept and would not eat.

 

         When Elkanah divided the peace offerings among his family, his beloved Hannah, who had no children, always received the largest portion. One can almost guess what this practice precipitated. Partiality always sets the stage for jealousy.

         Peninnah would antagonize Hannah to the point Hannah would fret, weep, and stop eating. So much for polygamy! Though tolerated in Old Testament days, it was never a part of God's intent for marriage. Polygamy always caused trouble.

         Peninnah is presented as a peevish and coarse woman. She added affliction to affliction, a hideous form of malice. Compounding the misfortune of another person is despicable. We are to bear one another's burdens, not add to them.

         Home should be a refuge from trial, but too often becomes the very scene of antagonism. One cranky family member can keep a household in an uproar from morning till night (Thank God people have to sleep at night!). There is never any shortage of rude people who can drop a "scalding drop into a sore place and make it sorer. It can be done so that you cannot print it and publish it; it can be done so that you cannot report it; it can be done so that you can only feel it. These are the miseries that spoil so many lives" (Parker).

 

1 Samuel 1:8-9 "Hannah, why are you crying?" her husband Elkanah asked. "Why won't you eat? Why are you troubled? Am I not better to you than 10 sons?" Hannah got up after they ate and drank at Shiloh. Eli the priest was sitting on a chair by the doorpost of the Lord's tabernacle.

 

         Hannah, realizing Elkanah did not understand her sorrow, left the family circle to be alone with her thoughts. She eventually made her way to where Eli the high priest was sitting at the tabernacle.

 

1 Samuel 1:10-11 Deeply hurt, Hannah prayed to the Lord and wept with many tears. Making a vow, she pleaded, "Lord of Hosts, if You will take notice of Your servant's affliction, remember and not forget me, and give Your servant a son, I will give him to the Lord all the days of his life, and his hair will never be cut."

 

         Mocked by her counterpart, and sensing the disappointment of her husband, Hannah responded properly. She did not speak sharply in return; instead she went to God in prayer. Bitterness of soul led her to prayer, which in turn led her to victory. Hannah allowed her adversity to be a steppingstone to faith rather than a stumbling block. Let the daily annoyances of life turn you toward prayer. This will draw you ever closer and closer to the Master.

In her deep sorrow, Hannah made a vow. If she could have a baby boy, he would be dedicated to service in the tabernacle for his whole life. Also, he would be set apart as a Nazirite, a person whose life was especially dedicated to the Lord.

        

1 Samuel 1:12-14 While she continued praying in the Lord's presence, Eli watched her lips. Hannah was praying silently, and though her lips were moving, her voice could not be heard. Eli thought she was drunk and scolded her, "How long are you going to be drunk? Get rid of your wine!"

 

         Hannah's lips moved as she silently prayed. Hereby she testified her belief that God knows our hearts and its desires; thoughts are words to Him (Henry).

         Eli had the unfortunate responsibility of serving as High Priest when Israel's spiritual life was at a low ebb. He had probably seen many loose and immoral women during his tenure. Eli assumed that Hannah was a mumbling drunk.

         Hannah's blessed communion with God was abruptly interrupted by Eli's sharp command. Poor Hannah! She had already been provoked by Peninnah and reproved by Elkanah. Now she is reprimanded by the High Priest.

         This was not the first or the last time a true worshiper would be ridiculed. Devotion is often misunderstood. Be careful in forming opinions about the conduct of another. Do not be rash and hasty to condemn. We cannot see intentions or know motives. Avoid vilifying the modes of worship practiced by others.

 

1 Samuel 1:15-20 "No, my lord," Hannah replied. "I am a woman with a broken heart. I haven't had any wine or beer; I've been pouring out my heart before the Lord. Don't think of me as a wicked woman; I've been praying from the depth of my anguish and resentment." Eli responded, "Go in peace, and may the God of Israel grant the petition you've requested from Him." "May your servant find favor with you," she replied. Then Hannah went on her way; she ate and no longer looked despondent. The next morning Elkanah and Hannah got up early to bow in worship before the Lord. Afterward, they returned home to Ramah. Then Elkanah was intimate with his wife Hannah, and the Lord remembered her. After some time, Hannah conceived and gave birth to a son. She named him Samuel, because she said, "I requested him from the Lord."

 

         Upon learning of his error, Eli prays that YHWH will grant her petition. Hannah found encouragement in the High Priest's words and went home rejoicing.

"Samuel" is made of two Hebrew words meaning "heard of God." The name would be a constant reminder that God heard the prayer of Hannah. She wanted never to forget, and wanted her son never to forget, he was a special gift from God. It would be good if we all remembered this truth about our own children.

 

1 Samuel 1:21-24a When Elkanah and all his household went up to make the annual sacrifice and his vow offering to the Lord, Hannah did not go and explained to her husband, "After the child is weaned, I'll take him to appear in the Lord's presence and to stay there permanently." Her husband Elkanah replied, "Do what you think is best, and stay here until you've weaned him. May the Lord confirm your word." So Hannah stayed there and nursed her son until she weaned him. When she had weaned him, she took him with her to Shiloh. 

        

         Elkanah allowed Hannah to keep the child at home for a while, but the vow must not be broken. Vows made in distress must not be forgotten in ease. Beware vows! But if you make one, be sure you fulfill it. Too many Christians are like the ancient merchant who in a storm vowed to sacrifice 100 bulls to Jupiter. After the storm he first reduced his pledge to one bull, then to a sheep, then to a few dates. Walking to the temple, he ate the dates and laid only the pits on the altar.

         Weaning took place about age three. Hannah not only had to wean the child, but also had to wean her own heart. Everyday endeared the child to her more, but she fulfilled her vow. In giving up Samuel, Hannah gave to God the light of her eyes, the joy of her heart, the costliest and most precious thing she possessed.

         The child was brought at an early age in order that the house of God might be the first dwelling he could remember. The earliest impressions upon his memory were to be of God's house. From his youngest days he would have impressed upon him the sacred presence of God.

         The significance of Hannah's gift is hard to overstate. Her child laid the foundation for a widespread prophetic order. He made it an office that exerted influence side by side with the priests and kings. He brought the prophetic order from obscurity to prominence. What Washington did for the USA Presidency, and what John Marshall did for the USA Supreme Court, Samuel did for the prophets.

         Before he was even born, Samuel was blessed by God. The prophet had a praying mother. Home is where children must receive most of their spiritual nurturing. A church, at best only supplemental, cannot replace the home. An ounce of godly parents is worth a pound of clergy. Home is the most important altar.

         The American statesman, John Randolph, said he would have been swept away by the flood of French infidelity had it not been for a saintly mother who taught him to kneel as a child beside her and to fold his hands in prayer.

John Newton learned to pray at his mother's knee. She died when he was eight, but her influence remained. When as an adult John was living the life of a blasphemer, he was caught in a storm at sea. He finally cried out, "My mother's God, thou God of Mercy, have mercy on me." Thus was converted the author of "Amazing Grace."

         In the 1800s, a mother wrote in her diary, "This morning I rose early to pray for my children, and especially that my sons may be ministers and missionaries of Jesus Christ." All five became preachers or missionaries.

When the sculptor Bacon was erecting a monument to Lord Chatham in Westminster Abbey, an observer told him, "Take care what you are doing, for you are working for eternity." Parents need the same reminder. The way children are raised has everlasting consequences. Parents, "take care what you are doing, for you are working for eternity."

 

Sunday, May 1, 2016

This Is My Body

Matthew 26:26b-27

This Is My Body

Dr. John E. Marshall

 

Matt. 26:26b (Holman)  . . .and broke it,. . .

 

Since the unleavened bread, being flat, was brittle, pieces had to be broken off rather than "torn" off. Breaking it predicted the sufferings about to take place.

Jesus' body will be broken, in the sense of being wounded and pierced. It is easy to see forecast in Jesus' words here the soon-coming fulfillment of Isaiah 53:5,6b, "He was pierced because of our transgressions, crushed because of our iniquities; punishment for our peace was on Him, and we are healed by His wounds. . . .The LORD has punished Him for the iniquity of us all."

 

Matt. 26:26c  . . .and gave it to the disciples, and said, "Take and eat it;"

 

Jesus "gave it"; He dispensed the elements. He distributed them willingly from His own hands; this reminds us He would offer the sacrifice voluntarily.

         "Take." He commanded them to receive the elements. They did not merit this gift. They had been arguing over who was the greatest among them. Their sole input was to simply receive it by faith due to God's grace.

         We "eat" to make something part of us. To "eat" this bread symbolizes our appropriating the benefits of what Jesus did for us on the cross. To let us know He wants to enter us and nourish us spiritually, He told us He is the Bread of life.

         The message here is significant. Christ's benefits are offered to all of us, but actually benefit only those who by faith appropriate them. To all who do not embrace the benefits of Jesus' death, He is a Savior who does not save them.

 

Matt. 26:26d  "This is My body."

 

Few words have more divided Christ-followers than these four have. There are four main views. One, transubstantiation. This is the Roman Catholic position. It says the elements, when taken, change into the literal flesh and blood of Jesus.

Two, consubstantiation. Luther invented this term. He believed the elements do not change, but Christ's substance is united with them in some special way.

Three, a spiritual presence. John Calvin held this view. He felt believers receive an extra blessing by the act of taking the Lord's Supper. Jesus is present in the meal in a special way; thus it has power in and of itself to give spiritual benefit.

We Baptists and many other evangelicals do not hold to any of these three. First, we believe no mystical change happens to the elements. We do not think they turn into the body and blood of Jesus. His body and blood were there before the disciples, and thus could not have been in the elements also at the same time.

Second, we believe nothing mystical comes alongside the elements; the body and blood of Jesus are not present with us in the elements. By definition, a body, to truly be a body, cannot be in more than one place or one form at one time. Since Jesus' body is in Heaven, it cannot be with the elements on Earth simultaneously.

Third, we do not believe the Lord's Supper has any mystical, spiritual power to dispense. God is spirit, and we find interaction with Him in nothing physical.

Baptists and many others embrace a fourth position. We see the Lord's Supper as a remembrance. A preponderance of Baptist Lord's Supper tables have inscribed on them, "This do in remembrance of Me." We view the elements as symbols, as when I show someone a picture and say, "This is my Ruthie."

This was the position of our Swiss Baptist Reformer, Ulrich Zwingli, who met with Luther at Marburg Castle (Oct. 1-4, 1529) in Germany to discuss their doctrines. They agreed on essentially every major teaching, except for the level of Jesus' presence in the Lord's Supper. Zwingli, after appealing repeatedly to John 6:63, "The flesh profits nothing", finally felt obligated to apologize to Luther, "I beg your pardon that this passage breaks your neck." Luther replied, "German necks don't break that easily, and you are in Germany, not Switzerland."

After this stalemate, Zwingli extended his hand to Luther, who refused to shake it. Zwingli, crushed at the Reformation leader's slight, quietly wept. Luther said to Zwingli, "I abandon you to God's judgment, and pray that He will enlighten you." Zwingli countered, "We will do the same, you need it as much as we."

We believe the bread and juice are mementos, taken in remembrance of Jesus' broken body and shed blood. They vividly remind us of our Savior's death, and kindle again our gratitude for what He has accomplished on our behalf.

We believers disagree on the extent of Jesus' bodily presence in the Lord's Supper, but two things we all agree on. First, we believe Jesus, though God of true God, had a body and blood. The Son of God voluntarily took on Himself a true human body and literal blood. The fact He became flesh and blood is utterly amazing. Always remember, at one time He had neither, and was spirit only.

Never take for granted what the immortal, invisible One did for us. Jesus died a real death in a real body that was buried in a real tomb He really vacated.

Second, we all believe the Lord's Supper serves as a neon billboard situated in the center of our life paths. It tells us to walk worthy of our calling before we go any farther. The Lord's Supper question is, "Are you right with God; right now?"

If not, immediately ask for forgiveness, and determine to move toward making everything right in our relationships with others. Some say "I am not worthy" and refuse to take the Supper time after time, claiming they do not want to be guilty of taking it unworthily. This reaction is wrong. Taking the Supper unworthily is no better than avoiding it unworthily. We may need to forego it once in order to make things right with another person, but the proper response is not to keep missing the Supper, but to make things right with God and others now.

 

Matt. 26:27a  Then He took a cup, . . .

 

         The bread and juice were distributed separately. Juice separated from the bread pictures blood separated from the body, which presents to our mind's eye the unmistakable imagery of death, yea, of death by violence. This was especially true of crucifixion. It was sadism perfected, reserved for slaves and the worst criminals.

        

Matt. 26:27b  . . .and after giving thanks,. . .

 

         Bible teacher John Phillips found a tender thought in these words. Jesus would soon suffer beyond human ability to comprehend, yet gave thanks. Why? Because He was able to look past His shed blood and see us being blessed by it 2000 years later. He could see us forgiven, saved, and seated around the throne, looking like Him. He could hear us singing our songs of praise this morning.

 

Matt. 26:27c  . . .He gave it to them, and said, "Drink from it, all of you."

 

         By ordering all to drink, Jesus stressed the unity and equality of believers. He welcomes all His followers to His table. It is the bond that unites us all. His death is the beating heart of our faith. Take away His blood, and you rip out the core of Christianity. "Leave out the cross, and you have killed the religion of Jesus" (Spurgeon).

         Everyone gathered around the throne in Heaven will be there because of the blood of Jesus. People have always been saved the same way, by faith in God as thus far revealed. In God's predetermined fullness of time, the ultimate sacrifice was offered. Everyone saved since Golgotha has been saved due to the cross appropriated. Everyone saved before Calvary was saved due to the cross in anticipation. In God's mind, it was as good as done. The Father trusted the Son.

         Since God the Father trusted the Son, shouldn't we? Our confidence in Him should be unwavering. I regret I do not trust Him more. Since foresight was good enough for the Father, hindsight ought to be good enough for us. We experience the crucifixion actually done, already accomplished, and verified by a resurrection.